Sharing Solar Power With Your Neighbours

Smart metering has come a long way. Most Victorian customers are now billed via a smart meter. There's been some hiccups along the way but generally speaking, for the bulk of customers their data is available daily and through the Jemena and United portals where an up-to-the-hour query will give customers the latest data, direct from their meter. For the rest of the country, smart meters are on their way and - with the added incentive of them actually doing something "smart", such as controlling household appliances - the demand for their widespread deployment will grow.

So what could be smarter about smart meters other than virtual net-metering with real-time visibility?

A virtual net-metering revolution has quietly occurred in a number of places around the world, including California in the US. California's version of virtual net-metering allows Californians living in a multi-dwelling building, such as an apartment complex, to have a shared solar system with a percentage of output from each interval (30 minutes is the standard for Australian smart meters) being allocated to each of the owners of the solar system. So if there were 10 residents in an apartment complex who owned a shared solar system on the roof generating 10kWh at midday, each customer would get 1kWh of power over one hour (two intervals), which would offset any of their usage during that period. If they didn't use any power then their 1kWh would be exported and they'd be paid the same as any other solar PV owner.



Origin: renewable-sources.blogspot.com

Read More

Cheap Solar Energy Storage

I've come across a couple of articles on one method for cheap solar power storage lately, and I thought I'd pass the idea along.In some countries like Australia (where I live) electric power companies pay a pittance for the solar power you export to the grid, around 6-8 cents a kilowatt hour. They charge an enormous amount for what you buy, up to 34 cents per kWh though.That means during the day if no one's home your solar system is pumping power into the grid and you get paid almost nothing. In the evening and night when the family is home but the sun isn't shining you're buying power for quite a lot.The only time you're really enjoying the benefits of free power from the sun is on the weekends and holidays, unless you work from home or you're retired.Even worse, in some places like Queensland, Australia (where I am right now) there has been talk of not allowing new solar systems to connect to the grid. It's rather ironic that Queensland calls itself the Sunshine State.> One Reason For Solar StorageBatteries are still too expensive for most people, so what can be done?The idea I've seen is to send excess solar power to heat the hot water. In Queensland for example, you could be saving 25 cents a kWh which is a lot better than the 6 or 8 cents you'd be paid if you exported that power to the utilities.In one system "Le Clair" paid just 99 to divert his excess solar electricity to his hot water. It used inexpensive programmable timer switches.In the U.K. REUK have actually developed a controller to send excess solar power to the hot water heater. Also in the U.K. is the solar iBoost, using surplus solar electricity to heat your hot water. Installed prices I've seen are around 350 pounds.This sort of storage won't suit everyone, for example if you're on one to one net metering, or if you're paid well for the power you sell to the grid. But for Australians, and anyone else with low feed in tariffs and high electricity prices it's one way to get more from your solar system.

Read More

Renewable Energy Is The Fire Extinguisher

Completely, electricity generated by renewable energy technologies are in general upper than their fossil fuel counterparts. Would that be the pattern if all the severely secret subsidies available to the oil, gas and nuclear industries were complete transparent? Who knows? That strife has been separation on for decades. But what's the resulting expenditure of the negative effects of the Flaw Shore beaches, marshes, oceanic ecosystems and tourism? What's the regard of climate-altering combustion?

German politicians and circle create vital (at least for the toll personality) that the expand in their electric bills is critically a reasonably small trust to pay what one considers all the options and their repercussion. (GW)

The German Experiment

The state-run sets a extra trust on solar and other alternative power sources. The policy offers lessons in ways to advocate the use of renewable energy.

By Evan I. Schwartz

Gear Reassessment

July/August 2010

A decade ago, Germany launched a renewable--energy plan on an unprecedented scale. Its council, the Bundestag, enacted a law obligating the nation's electric utilities to classification green power at vast rates--as widely as 60 cents per kilowatt-hour for solar--under hard contracts stable up to 20 kick. (German put up for sale prices for electricity, overall formed by coal and nuclear plants, were about 12 cents per kilowatt-hour.) The purpose downward this "feed-in grade" was that everybody would be able to widen a renewable-power plant--or install rooftop solar panels--and be certified standard income by feeding energy modish the get, where utilities would buy it at extra prices. The upper expenditure would be passed on as monthly surcharges to ratepayers, take off out plus all homes and businesses in a obtain of about 80 million league. Relic and nuclear fuels better part to "global pyromania," held Hermann Scheer, the German representative who championed the policy. "Renewable energy is the take extinguisher."

Now, as the Dual States and other nations askew just before creating their own policies for healing with conditions change direction, the strike of the German try your hand is a subject of strife. From one perspective, the Renewable Constrain Sources Act of 2000 has exceeded its aims. Germany's basic through was to get at least 10 percent of its electric power from renewable sources by 2010. The German get now gets exceptional than 16 percent of its electricity from these sources, and the state-run has raised its through for 2020 from 20 percent to 30 percent. The obtain avoided pumping about 74 million metric bags of carbon dioxide modish the sensations in 2009. The German environment ministry the same touts a set benefit: just about 300,000 new jobs in clean power. As a notch, the feed-in grade has the subsidize not only of the left-leaning politicians who number one backed it but the same of top figure of the skeptics in the right-leaning parties that fought versus it, says Claudia Kemfert, who heads the energy division at the German Bring in for Pecuniary Analyze in Berlin. "The astonishment is concluded," she says. "We're celebrating the good thing."

But from choice perspective, the German policy is a state-run boondoggle. "It's not funny that if you block prosperity grant at a certain technology, league will use it," says Severin Borenstein, codirector of the Constrain Bring in at UC Berkeley's Haas Progression of The system. Yes, the incentives triggered a frenzy of renewable-power installations, but at "more accurately vast prices," says Henry Lee, a cut above of the Qualifications and Childlike Material goods Line at Harvard's John F. Kennedy Progression of Government. The use on photovoltaics has been in addition cost-inefficient in disclaimer of producing power, Lee adds, at the same time as "Germany is the cloudiest obtain in Europe." Nonetheless the weather, Germany now accounts for lacking the world's 20 gigawatts of installed solar rule. "To the same extent that gets you," says Lee, "is vast prices for electricity, reliable in for 20 kick, from technology that will be out of perceive appearing in three kick." Concludes -Borenstein: "That's a dud of grandeur policy."

As for the job-creation benefit, it may blunt out to be departure. Solar panels and wind turbines can be affected just about where in the world. Now, partly at the same time as of title fight from cheap manufacturing in China "(see "Solar's Stunning Frolic Dispatch," p.52)", many German manufacturers of this technology are besieged. Q-Cells, Conergy, and Solarworld create seen their stock steady flow widely of its support on or after the start of 2008. Anton -Milner, the institution CEO of Q-Cells, pessimistic in Parade whilst the company reported an annual report ruin of 1.36 billion euros (1.67 billion). In May, to call together pace with the tumbling regard of solar panels, the Bundestag cut the collect it set for issue solar power to the get by 11 to 16 percent on top of a without stopping annual report dive of 10 percent. To try to act with imports, solar companies create on fire hundreds of staff, and the nation's solar argument association has warned of ordinary exceptional layoffs.

Meanwhile, several of the countries that hackneyed key be opposite of the German policy create the same seen their booms start to fizz. In 2008, Spain set an lifetime transcribe for photo-voltaics, installing 2.46 gigawatts' advantage of solar panels in a greatest year--41 percent of all new installation worldwide, according to Solarbuzz, a research and consulting resolute. But in Spain, selling all that steep power became a interference to the utilities. That, out of action with a longer tremble demonstration and sullen pricing, caused the tariffs to be drastically cut. Without the vast incentives, in 2009 Spain installed only 6 percent of the world's new solar-power rule.

Anyway, concentration in feed-in tariffs is mounting in the Dual States. At least two cities--Sacramento, CA, and Gainesville, FL--have enacted pub diplomacy. California, Hawaii, and Vermont create passed laws that would create their own feed-in tariffs, and at least 15 other states create calculated it.

To the same extent cogency these policies cost? In Germany, electricity prices create soared exceptional than 60 percent concluded the exterior decade. But Germany's fresh ministry says the grade system is sensible for beneath than a 10th of that expand, or about 3 per month for a typical recognizable. In the role of German households usage about lacking as widely electricity as U.S. homes, the get by without regard for renewable energy has not been a deal-breaker for the grandeur, says Kemfert, who contends that a largest part of Germans subsidize it. Accomplish, the grade regard Germany an unreal 11 billion in 2008 separately, about a third of 1 percent of its GDP.

But why ordinary cover with soap with feed-in tariffs? Numerous economists focus either a carbon tax or a cap-and-trade system in which electricity plants buy permits to burn fossil fuel. "It would be better to tax shady power than fund green power," says Borenstein. Coal is the biggest carbon emitter plus all energy sources, and it right now accounts for about lacking the electricity formed in the Dual States as pleasingly as in Germany. Phasing out coal obligation be the main image, and pursuing that image by putting a trust on carbon, he says, allows the put up for sale to be of the same opinion which renewable sources are top figure competent. That's exceptional valuable than leasing the state-run set prices.

Nevertheless, neither cap-and-trade nor a rank tax may be politically probable in the Dual States. So would a in feed-in grade be an due alternative? Or would it the same be politically predetermined, on or after it, too, would extend electricity prices? To make a pattern for it, politicians would need to meet with the American grandeur that renewable power is advantage it, pointing to Germany as the example. Emphatically, the German try your hand does put on air that a large professional union can be in charge ambitious goals for scaling up new sources of clean electricity, with users paying the way. Germany expects to result in top figure of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030. Meanwhile, the Dual States produces only about 7 percent of its electricity from such sources, top figure of that from elderly hydroelectric plants.

The absolute moment of the German plan, on the other hand, may not be as a arise for other countries but as a source of enduring change direction in the world's energy economy. In this mode, Germany can be compared to in advance adopters of new gadgets, who habitually pay scandalous prices ordinary on the other hand they make somebody's acquaintance that others will get exceptional technology for widely beneath a few kick successive.

Grip the changes in the put up for sale for wind power. By 2006, Germany had by far the leading wind-power base in the world, with 20.6 gigawatts of rule. The older scale brought the regard short, and wind began nearing get parity in many parts of the world. In 2009, the Dual States and China were able to sweep over Germany in rule, but at far exceptional ample prices.

Praise in limb to the Germans, the self-same production now appears to be enfant terrible in solar, with prices of photovoltaic panels tumbling 40 percent train year separately. Yes, the critics are right that Germany's use was profusely fruitless. But what Germany did was prepare the global markets, inspection that renewable technologies can be a big business matchless of investment. As a notch, the Dual States may not need to mark out Germany's try your hand to get the rewards.

Evan I. Schwartz is an maker and author. He formed and cowrote "Saved by the Sun, "a PBS/"NOVA" documentary featuring a portion about the German solar policy.

Copyright Gear Reassessment 2010.

Read More

Fits Reductions Get Mixed Reaction From Renewables Industry

One installer says the new proposals "could spell Armageddon for the industry".

The solar industry has responded with mixed feelings to DECC's new proposed changes to the Feed-In Tariff system for small scale renewable energy, announced yesterday.

In its response to the consultation on FITs for solar PV, the Government admits that 81% of respondents disagreed with their proposed reduced tariffs for solar PV installations and with the proposed reference date of 12 December 2011, compared to 12% who agreed.

Nevertheless, it is proceeding with the tariff reductions, and the appeal to the Supreme Court over the legality of the cut-off date for the high tariff rate.

The new tariff rate includes a drop to 21p/kWh for systems under 4kW, until June 30. It estimates the cost to taxpayers of all the new tariffs to be lb1.2 billion over 25 years.

The reductions are based on research showing that the average cost of a 2.6kW system has dropped from lb15,000 in 2010 to lb12,000 in 2012. They aim to provide an approximate 5% rate of return to their owners for well located installations.

DECC projects around six million installations by 2020 based on the new tariffs, which over their lifetime will involve total costs, the Impact Assessment says, of lb54.3 billion. [Note: the document contains several errors so this figure, high as it seems, may not be correct.]

Nevertheless, the Impact Assessment calculates a net benefit of around lb400 million because the savings on social costs outweigh the overall costs, compared to a loss of lb600 million under the original scenario.

The response does contain a concession to objectors from the solar industry: that the energy efficiency requirement that will be a condition of receiving FIT support should be based on an Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) rating of level 'D' or above, not the more stringent level 'C', as previously mooted, as this excluded too many homes.

Even so, it will almost certainly exclude the majority of old, solid-walled homes, that do not have wall insulation. DECC estimates that about half of all properties are already at the 'D' rating level.

A second concession is that the threshold at which the multi-installation tariff rates would apply has been increased from more than one PV installation to over twenty five. These rates are set at 80% of the standard tariffs to reflect the economies of scale gained from tackling several roofs at once.

Individuals or organisations with 25 or fewer installations will still be eligible for the individual rate.

"This will help community groups, small businesses and councils who do not benefit from the economies of scale that larger aggregators can obtain," said Energy Secretary Ed Davey.

DECC says it is using budget flexibility to cover the overspend resulting from high PV uptake of 240,000 installations over the last year, while still allowing lb460 million for new installations over the Spending Review period.

The statement says this will not impact any further on consumer bills, since DECC is juggling overspends and underspends in the overall amount allocated to it for renewables under the Comprehensive Spending Review between the budgets for FITs, the Renewables Obligation, and the Warm Home Discount.

WHAT HAPPENS BEYOND JUNE?

A new consultation is beginning, and it is this which so far appears to be the most disheartening for the solar industry, for it proposes a reduction of 10% of solar PV tariffs every six months, with an added deployment trigger to ensure that subsidy levels keep in step with the market.

It is based on projections which estimate that system costs will fall by two thirds by 2020.

The proposals would make the tariffs from 1 July onwards dependent on the levels of actual deployment of new eligible installations seen in March and April.

They outline three ways of calculating the level, which could bring rates down as low as 13.6p/kWh for installations below or equal to 4kW.

This structure is aimed at protecting the scheme's budget and creating long term certainty for consumers and investors about what the FIT rates will be.

However, one installer said this "could spell Armageddon for the industry. Yet again the Government, even with a newly appointed Energy Secretary in Ed Davey, seem happy to watch the solar industry lurch from one crisis to the next," said David Hunt, a director with Eco Environments.

Friends of the Earth's Executive Director Andy Atkins also said that the "distinctly unclear solar road map leaves a dark cloud hanging over thousands of jobs".

But others welcomed the news.

Robert Goss, Managing Director of Conergy UK, called it "a very good day for British solar. There will be a boom in May and June as people look to complete installations before the June tariff reduction, with returns of seven to nine percent".

A spokesperson for Good Energy said they considered this "a step forward".

"The industry was in desperate need of more clarity and the government has moved to provide that," said its CEO, Juliet Davenport. "The rate changes proposed for solar PV are a reflection of the well-known problems with the FIT budget and it will take time to fully digest what they mean."

Ed Davey said the proposals, "will remove the need for emergency reviews, consistent with our commitment to a stable, predictable future for solar PV and for the whole FITs scheme.

"It will also help to keep the long-term costs of supporting solar PV down, increasing the number of people able to benefit from FITs over time," he added.

The consultation closes on 3 April.

OTHER FIT TECHNOLOGIES

A further consultation has been launched on tariffs for technologies other than PV, including potential arrangements for community projects.

Significantly, it proposes an increase in the rate of return available for micro-combined heat and power, as ministers believe this could bring multiple benefits.

It also outlines potential tariff guarantees for wind, anaerobic digestion and hydro projects, to provide greater certainty about what rates of return they will receive.

This was welcomed by Don Leiper, Director of New Business at E.ON, which has been investing for a few years in micro-CHP for the home market.

He called it "a key step towards building a mass market for what is a smarter home heating and power solution that can save customers money and contribute to saving the planet".

E.ON calculates that under the new Feed-in Tariff scheme, homeowners installing microCHP could see financial savings of more than lb600 per year, including electricity savings of lb194 and export payments of lb46.

This consultation closes on 26 April.

Concluding the announcements, Climate Change Minister Greg Barker said: "Our new plans will see almost two and a half times more installations than originally projected by 2015 which is good news for the sustainable growth of the industry.

"We are proposing a more predictable and transparent scheme as the costs of technologies fall, ensuring a long term, predictable rate of return that will closely track changes in prices and deployment."

The impact of the FIT cuts on solar have captured the headlines, but they have also affected small wind power installations.

Trade association RenewableUK said tariffs for these have been slashed by over 40%, while farm and small business-scale turbines have seen cuts of over a quarter, and it expressed anxiety over the possible impact on jobs.

Story: David Thorpe, News Editor

Read More

Feed In Tariffs Review Lets Subsidise What Works

The Government has announced a review of the Feed-in Tariff subsidies (FITs) for solar photovoltaic installations.

Energy Minister Chris Huhne is worried that large PV 'farms' of over 50kWp will soak up most of the budget for FITs. The Government said it would cut the amount it would spend on FITs up to 2014-15 by 10% to lb360 million in the November Spending Review.

The industry is crying 'foul'. It complains that other technologies are allowed up to 5MW per installation and that no solar farms greater than 1MW are in planning. It accuses the Government of attacking jobs in the very green tech sector it says is going to bring growth to the UK economy.

But it's worth asking: what are the subsidies for? Here are a few possible answers:

1. Huhne talks of making renewable technology seem normal by being visible on lots of roofs.

2. It's said that households with the modules become more conscious of green issues and energy efficiency.

3. By increasing demand, the price of modules is supposed to come down over time.

4. It creates jobs in an emerging sector.

5. It cuts carbon emissions.

But do these stand up to scrutiny and represent value for money?

FITs are a fantastic success, particularly for PV, in stimulating demand for renewable energy among the public. There are now over 21,000 schemes of all technologies registered.

Up to the end of December, when there were 16,384 installations, PV had the vast majority with 15,236 - over 15 times more than wind in second place with 977 with hydro lagging at 154.

Are these large PV schemes? No. By the end of last year there was only one over the 50kW size, at 55kW. The vast majority were under 4kW with the average at 2.6kW. Most of these will be receiving the full tariff value of 41.3p per unit.

On the other hand almost all the hydro and wind installations were over 4kW, many over 10kW. Most of these will be receiving only 26.7p per unit.

By contrast, if PV farms were to register for the Renewables Obligation subsidy - an older, different subsidy for larger schemes - they would receive payments of around 8p/kWh plus export payments of 5p/kWh (though this is to be reviewed).

So PV receives almost twice as much under FITs as wind and other technologies. You can see why it is so popular. But is it value for money?

Let's remember that the installed capacity of PV doesn't equate to what will be generated: this depends on the location - the amount of sunshine.

Solar module manufacturers quote figures for the "peak power" of their products. These are what they would generate if one kilowatt per square metre of the sun's energy were to fall on them.

But for most of England and Wales, the summer insolation is a fraction of that figure. London gets 198W and Edinburgh 172W in July. In December, the figures are 22 and 13 respectively - a lot less - and that's when you need more power.

By contrast, wind and hydro ratings are significantly closer to what you actually get out of the plant.

So if you're looking for saving the most carbon per lb, these technologies are a better choice for support.

But let's remember also who pays for the subsidies. The money comes off a levy on everyone's electricity bills. This means we all help pay the income of those who can afford to install the solar modules.

Since those on low incomes pay a disproportionate amount of their income on fuel, they are essentially subsidising the better-off.

On that basis the Government is right to prevent this subsidy going to large landowners and companies seeking to install solar farms.

Instead, it should support installations by such groups as housing associations like the Peabody Trust, who are putting PVs on the roofs of social housing.

(However it is cheaper to build larger installations than smaller ones - because savings on overheads and systems mean costs are reduced per kW. So these would make financial sense if the cash came instead from investors.)

In America this week, Energy Secretary Steven Chu announced that he wants to spend 27 million to cut the cost of installed solar power by 75 percent to about 6 cents per kilowatt hour in order to let the US compete with China's takeover of the solar market.

Fine for them - the southern states are where solar power works brilliantly. By contrast, even in the UK's southernmost counties, the financial paybacks are 30-50 years - all costs included.

What the UK is rich in are wind and ocean resources. If it wants to generate future jobs and save carbon, with renewable technologies that can work domestically and be exported throughout the world, it should focus its limited resources on these.

Read More

Governor Releases Faqs On Clean Energy Jobs Act Bill

"From the frequently asked questions (FAQs) on the Clean Energy Jobs Act bill:"

ENHANCED ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION

Q: Won't increased funding for statewide energy efficiency programs come out of the pockets of Wisconsin ratepayers? We shouldn't be raising energy costs during an economic downturn by adding more fees to our utility bills.

A: Investing more money in energy efficiency has a demonstrable, risk-free payback for Wisconsin residents and businesses. Over the long run we will use less energy, which means we'll actually be reducing our energy bills.

The cost of conserving energy is far less than the cost of building new power generation. Energy efficiency and conservation efforts are the least-cost means of mitigating carbon pollution.

Investing in energy efficiency also translates into stable, family-supporting jobs, particularly within the building and construction trades and at the 50+ businesses in Wisconsin that manufacture Energy Star appliances, windows, and other products....

RENEWABLE FUELS

Q: Will an Enhanced Renewable Portfolio Standard require the build-out of costly electric generation that Wisconsin doesn't need, while doing nothing to reduce the demand for electricity? Don't renewable energy sources cost more than coal and natural gas?

A: Each year, we send over 16 billion out of state to purchase coal, natural gas, and petroleum products to meet our energy demands. Every dollar we spend on these fossil fuels is a dollar that leaves Wisconsin. By increasing our state's renewable portfolio standards, we are guaranteeing that more of our energy dollars remain here, and creating thousands of jobs for Wisconsin families in construction and building trades work, and, in the longer term, supply-chain jobs in our manufacturing, agricultural, and forestry sectors.

Also, the EPA has moved to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act, which means that costs associated with burning coal and natural gas will continue to rise. We cannot continue to pretend that exclusive reliance on fossil fuels for power generation is either sustainable or affordable in the long term. We need to speed our transition to a cleaner energy economy and position Wisconsin as a leader in this growing industry before other states get ahead of us.

As we add renewable sources of energy to our fleet, many of the older and less efficient fossil fuel burning units will gradually be retired, and Wisconsin's generation capacity will fall in line with demand. Initial infrastructure costs associated with a transition to renewables will be off-set by producing cleaner and reliable renewable energy for Wisconsin over the long-term. Meanwhile, the cost of renewable generation technologies continues to fall when compared to fossil fuel alternatives.

Increased reliance on renewable energy is central to creating a more sustainable Wisconsin. Life cycle costs associated with fossil fuel have a significantly greater adverse impact on public health, quality of life, and the environment.

ADVANCED RENEWABLE TARIFFS

Q: Won't Advanced Renewable Tariffs simply increase the cost of energy for everyone by subsidizing certain types of renewable technologies at a cost that is higher than the market would otherwise tolerate? Don't Advanced Renewable Tariffs duplicate the efforts of the Renewable Portfolio Standard?

A: Evidence from around the world suggests that feed-in tariffs lead to faster deployment of renewable generation sources than a stand-alone Renewable Portfolio Standard. Advanced Renewable Tariffs will help harness the power of Wisconsin's rich agricultural resources by making it easier and more cost-effective for farmers to take farm-waste and generate electricity with it to power their farming operations and deliver clean, renewable energy back to the grid.

Incenting the deployment of smaller-scale, more distributed renewable generation sources cuts down on our state's transmission infrastructure costs and will reduce our reliance on out-of-state renewable power in the long term.

This policy helps level the playing field so individual homeowners, farmers, and businesses can earn a return on investments in renewable energy that is similar to the returns that utilities earn.

Read More

Government Delays Crucial Decision On Renewable Energy Subsidies

The dealing out has reportedly delayed a worthy suburb on aid levels for wind farms and other forms of renewable energy, at the rear ministers slipshod to solution a stand-off between Chancellor George Osborne and senior Tolerant Democrats.An freedom on the plump of esteem that renewable energy projects can hope to bring in completed the Renewables Liability Documents (ROC) aid affair completed to 2017 had been liable currently, by means of ministers successively stressing that they required to secure the reality at the forefront the summer's parliamentary hiatus.Renewable-energy developers claim complained that millions of pounds of backing is nowadays on control as a evict of the deficiency of delineation over the profits they can hope.But according to news flash in each one the"Telegraph "and the" Economic Time,"the worthy suburb has now been delayed until the autumn amongst abiding disagreements at the top of the community over the plump of esteem that requirement be complete made known to onshore wind farms.Entrance Advanced In the field of at Communication Bucolic.com

Read More

California Redefines Solar Net Metering Will Restructure Residential Electricity Rates

SANJAY, AS THE Sub- Blanket Forewarning AND Upper OF Policy AND ELECTRICITY MARKETS AT SOLARCITY, THE NATION'S Major Loaded Honor PHOTOVOLTAIC Stellar Take PROVIDER FOR Urban, Trailer, AND Government Clientele, Petition Select OUR READERS UP TO Ensure ON THE Developing Sell FOR ROOFTOP Stellar.

SANJAY RANCHOD: On the policy head start, the California lower house accepted Parliament Financial credit 327 decently forward adjourning for the court, and this legislation is going to make a big dissimilarity for the rooftop solar industry.

Treat individually, AB 327 is going to reckoning in the exclusion of precincts on the state's net energy metering law and is furthermore going to reckoning in every type reforms to the electricity rate theme for urban consumers of the state's investor-owned utilities. The principal expansion is that the inhibit establishes a process and timeline for the development of a new, uncapped net metering program. That's telling being immediately the net energy metering law in California includes a 5 percent statutory cap, which method such as that cap is reached, which the industry generally projects would permit in 2016 to 2017, out cold standard law, the investor-owned utilities would bring into being no prerequisite to keep on to commit net energy metering to new consumers.

The inhibit requires that the California Ordinary Utilities Lobby group develop programming for a new program that give go appearing in value July 2017 or preceding to that meeting if the cap is reached rear. And that new program give bring into being no put in cap, apiece in qualifications of the spring of new competent spender generators entitled to designate renovate or the complete generating capacity.

That's a big appreciative being, as you may have an effect, up until this think a lot of the statutory cap has obtainable an domineering and artificial keep a tight rein on on the growth of rooftop solar in California. The solar industry has had to warfare all few animation to get that statutory cap increased in union to not hit a cliff. The cap started at 0.1 percent in the mid-1990s and as a result was raised in increments until now. In 2002 it was increased to partly a percent; in 2006 it was increased to 2.5 percent; in 2010 it was increased to 5 percent; as a result final court the Ordinary Utilities Lobby group issued a genuinely telling discrimination that clarified how the 5 percent cap is to be mull over and fine increased the generating capacity out cold the cap intensely. But dull the 5 percent cap was a perfectly hazard to growth of the rooftop solar industry, and effortless forward thrashing the 5 percent cap portray was the hope for the PUC to keep net metering for new consumers on January 1, 2015. The inhibit, AB 327, clarifies that net metering cannot be pending forward the 5 percent cap is reached, and it codifies in decree the come within reach of that the PUC adopted in its discrimination final court for how the cap is to be mull over.

At hand are a be given a ride telling accouterments in the inhibit for stakeholders to be restive of. Two accouterments that the utilities hard-pressed genuinely strenuous for are permission for the PUC to put together row 1 and 2 tariff for urban consumers. That gives the PUC the ability to, at the awfully designate, poorer the row 3, 4, and 5 tariff. The reckoning is portray promise give be a discrimination by the PUC at every think a lot of in the past six to nine months to re-enactment our standard urban rate theme structure to fine drop it a bit and water down the spring of tiers and water down the increments between populate tiers so that we bring into being a quite surge rate structure. That's helpful for every consumers, for example, in the Chief Be successful, who pay awfully elevated magazine electricity bills in the summer such as they bring into being to run their AC continuously and get kicked up appearing in row 4 and 5 at a genuinely elevated small rate. Anything that would do for the solar market is water down the hope savings for the row 4 and 5 consumers who bring into being the primary inhibit, but it give furthermore errand tariff for known factor rate payers for whom solar immediately does not pencil, so it may errand the spring of rate payers for whom solar tremendously is a good lushness debit.

Elaborate ON THE Transactions Type TENSIONS THAT Hold back Want FESTERED Surrounded by THE ROOFTOP Stellar Firm AND INVESTOR-OWNED UTILITIES TO Leave OUR READERS A Loaded Aim OF Anything THE Reference OF AB 327 ACCOMPLISHES.

The inhibit was amended intensely all over the final few weeks of the constitutional group of students to insert the net metering and other solar amendments. At the end of the day, this is a inhibit that was supported by the solar industry, the utilities, and the ratepayer advocates. It was a genuinely salient grouping of stakeholders who supported the irreversible product, and the inhibit is not magical for any of populate stakeholders.

At hand are provisions in the inhibit that the solar industry would very not be included, and portray are definitely provisions in the inhibit, namely the net metering amendments, that the investor-owned utilities prefer not to be included. But this legislation is going to commit choice tighten and a clearer follow valley for apiece the investor-owned utilities and the rooftop solar industry being we bring into being clarity on the outcome of net metering. This is plunder appearing in illustration that a spring of telling decisions about success give be ended at the PUC in the past be given a ride of animation, so it give be telling for the PUC to rod the inhibit source to progress to its balk. The rooftop solar industry gets a follow valley, and the benefactor utilities are going to designate the ability to make type changes with the PUC's liking to their urban rate theme, which they bring into being hunted for every designate. They are furthermore going to bring into being the outlook to charge the PUC to rod a low magazine quick permeate on urban consumers, which is a genuinely disputable expansion that give be vigorously debated at the PUC.

THE RATEPAYER ADVOCATES WERE Epic STAKEHOLDER IN AB 327'S CRAFTING. HOW DID THEY Deem THE Reference OF THIS Basic CALIFORNIA LEGISLATION?

One of the key ratepayer shove groups (Quit) supports the inhibit in back into a corner being it does two things: it establishes a cap on quick charges of 10 a month-that's telling being it method that quick charges cannot be untouchable than that level-and it furthermore give keep on the type rate discounts for low-income consumers who are on the Control program.

Anything PRECEDENTIAL Appeal Will AB 327 Hold back FOR Last STATES AND THEIR Dictatorial AGENCIES, AND FOR Ordinary Take UTILITIES NOT GOVERNED BY Borough PUCS?

Comparison many aspects of energy and ecological policy ended at the state drawn, California's decisions support a lot of faculty and are watched closely by the bring to a standstill of the potential. This solution in person in AB 327 becomes a template and a design for other states who are unappreciated to equate a follow valley for continued growth of the rooftop solar industry in a way that's sustainable for the investor-owned utilities as analytical.

IF THE Determination OF THE ROOFTOP Stellar Firm IS TO Infusion Echoingly, HOW Will CALIFORNIA'S Initiative POLICIES Have an effect on AND Accelerate Punter Assets AND INSTALLATION?

AB 327 removes the blur from first to last the outcome of net energy metering, which is the key policy that enables rooftop solar to commit economic lushness to its consumers. Any keep a tight rein on or shaft on net energy metering programs and availability to outcome consumers presents the luck of limiting the rooftop solar industry's growth. This inhibit tremendously makes clear that to the same degree we don't yet have an effect what the uninhibited programming of that new uncapped program give be, we give bring into being an uncapped program, and we give have an effect what the programming are forward it is implemented. That tighten and visibility for the industry are tremendously key for periodic to put together the financing, to install systems and to bold the employment.

ROOFTOP Stellar INDUSTRY'S Productivity RELIES ON A Positive DELTA Surrounded by THE Demise OF Stellar Initiative (AND ITS Installation) AND Task Collect FOR Urban Initiative. Anything GIVES YOUR Firm Commitment THAT THIS DELTA Will BE Positive IN Imminent YEARS?

The solar industry and SolarCity in limited are never-endingly unappreciated to harass our indemnity gloomy, and this has been telling being, for example, the California Stellar Clue money-making incentives and rebates bring into being declined from first to last designate to the think a lot of where they are are no longer elsewhere for maximum urban consumers in the renovate territories of investors-owned utilities. It's a need by the industry, as we scale and spread, to keep on to accept our indemnity gloomy so that we can be rewarding. The industry give include substitute type countenance in 2016 such as the federal Assets Tax Credit drops from 30 percent to 10 percent, so that assist compels the industry to keep on to harass indemnity gloomy so that we give be able to impart economic lushness lay down solar effortless such as the principal reputation think logically is lowered.

HOW Will Championship OF AB 327 Ask CALIFORNIA'S RENEWABLE PORTFOLIO Perfect Get hard GOALS - 33 PERCENT RENEWABLES BY 2020?

It does insert provisions concerning California's RPS, which immediately requires utilities to procure 33 percent of their electricity from competent renewable resources by 2020. Customary law prohibits the PUC from requiring the procurement of competent resources in surplus of that 33 percent drawn so in a majestic first for RPS programs, AB 327 removes that shaft and in fact authorizes the PUC to absorb procurement by the investor-owned utilities of resources effortless in surplus of 33 percent. Now the PUC does not bring into being say from first to last the affirm utilities, so this expansion in law applies straightforwardly to the investor-owned utilities but it is an telling presage that the 33 percent RPS is calculated by Sacramento to be a downhill and not a boundary.

TO Say, HOW WOULD YOU Estimate THE Unripe Record OF CALIFORNIA Legislature IN 2013, Barely, VIS-A-VIS Stellar AND INCENTING Improved Belief ON Clean ENERGY?

I cost portray give be deal, assuming that the superintendent secret code AB 327 appearing in law, that California in 2013 demonstrated that it continues to be the majestic religious teacher in solar and thatit give keep on to set scathing turnup policy to escort and bold the transition to a clean energy economy and do so in a way that enables the private sector to create jobs impart the state.

Tags: Sanjay RanchodAB 327SolarCityEnergySolar EnergyNet MeteringRooftop SolarCalifornia

Read More

We Are At The Beginning Of The Learning Curve

NEW ENERGY: THE PROSUMER AMENDMENT DISTINGUISHES BETWEEN INSTALLATIONS BELOW 3 KW AND THOSE BETWEEN 3 AND 10 KW. WHY IS THIS?

Grzegorz Wi'sniewski: Renewable energy installations with an installed capacity of below 3 kW, such as roof-mounted photovoltaic panels or small wind energy installations, provide as much electricity as an average household in Poland annually consumes: around 2,500 kWh. The prosumer amendment covers the costs of such an installation and will also enable less well-off citizens to get a loan to finance the investment. Installations between 3 and 10 kW can power multi-family buildings, farms, hospitals, schools and small industrial premises. We also aim to develop the market for micro biogas power plants in this category.

NE: THE PROSUMER AMENDMENT INCLUDES A TOTAL CAP ON THE INSTALLATIONS: ONLY THE FIST 800 MEGAWATTS (MW) WILL QUALITY FOR THE FEED-IN TARIFFS. WHAT IS THE REASON BEHIND THIS PROPOSED LIMIT?

Wi'sniewski: I have to admit that the main reason for introducing this cap was the difficult political situation for renewables in Poland resulting from the government's initial attempts to block the development of any kind of citizen energy. We also anticipated criticism from the public-owned power utilities that only see the costs of the feed-in tariffs but ignore the windfall profits that state subsidies for biomass cofiring and old hydropower plants will bring. Prosumers constitute a huge challenge for them, endangering their dominant role in the power market. Even though the feed-in tariffs only apply to micro-installations, and despite the cap of 800 MW, some government representatives and all energy companies still fircely opposed the amendment. The feed-in tariffs were only adopted because of almost unanimous support from all opposition parties and the Polish People's Party, which is in the ruling coalition.

NE: ONE OF THE MAIN ELEMENTS OF THE PROSUMER AMENDMENT THAT WAS CRITICISED WAS THE LEVEL OF THE TARIFFS: FOR PHOTOVOLTAIC INSTALLATIONS BELOW 3 KW IT WILL BE JUST UNDER 18 EUROCENTS PER KILOWATT HOUR (KWH). THIS IS MUCH MORE THAN GERMAN PROSUMERS CURRENTLY RECEIVE. WHAT IS THE JUSTIFICATION FOR THIS?

Wi'sniewski: The PV market in Germany is much more developed than in Poland. This means that the initial expense is much higher - especially the costs of small installations to prepare the investment, install the panels and buy the panels themselves. The interest rates on bank loans are also much higher in Poland than they are in Germany. In Poland we are at the beginning of the learning curve. We currently have around 1,200 installations with an installed capacity below 40 kW per unit connected to the grid which is only 6 MW in total. On account of the legal and economic barriers associated with connecting installations to the local grid, the investment risk in Poland is much greater than in Germany. We also feared that if we set the tariffs too low this would trigger investors to use low-quality installations, which would discourage others from becoming prosumers. But the feed-in amendment does give the Ministry of Economics scope to adapt the level of the tariffs as costs decrease. As the market for prosumers is still very young, the amendment does not set a specific level of digression.

NE: ONE OF THE MAJOR REASONS FOR THE GOVERNMENT'S OPPOSITION WAS THE PURPORTEDLY HIGH COSTS OF FEED-IN TARIFFS FOR ELECTRICITY CONSUMERS. THE MINISTRY OF ECONOMICS EVEN PRESENTED CALCULATIONS ACCORDING TO WHICH THE ADOPTION OF THE PROSUMER AMENDMENT WOULD INCREASE ENERGY PRICES BY PLN 3.17 (79 EUROCENTS) PER MEGAWATT HOUR (MWH). HAVE ANY TOOLS BEEN INTRODUCED TO STOP SUCH A STEEP INCREASE IN ENERGY COSTS FOR THE AVERAGE CITIZEN?

Wi'sniewski: According to an indepth analysis carried out by our institute, the government's calculations are incorrect and significantly inflate the costs of the feed-in tariffs for consumers. Our calculations show that the prosumer amendment will increase the renewables surcharge by a maximum of 8 eurocents per MWh, not 79 eurocents as claimed by the government. There were substantial methodological errors in the government's calculations of the costs of the amendment. And it was on the basis of these unfounded figures that the government asked the Sen ate, the upper house of the Polish parliament, to reject the prosumer amendment. Just before the vote in the Sejm, the Ministry of Economics presented amended calculations according to which the introduction of feed-in tariffs for micro-installations would increase the renewables surcharge by around 12 eurocents per MWh - much lower than its initial calculations of 79 eurocents, but still higher than our calculations.

NE: GIVEN THESE RELATIVELY LOW ADDITIONAL COSTS, WHAT DO YOU THINK WERE THE MAIN REASONS WHY THE GOVERNMENT WAS SO STRONGLY OPPOSED TO THE INTRODUCTION OF FEED-IN TARIFFS FOR SMALL INSTALLATIONS?

Wi'sniewski: The debate on the prosumer amendment was about more than just supporting micro-installations; it also touched on fundamental aspects of how Poland's electricity market works. Despite the structural and technological changes taking place in most other countries, especially in Germany, the Polish power sector is still dominated by four public-owned utilities - PGE, Tauron, Enea and Energa - along with RWE as a minor player. These companies not only generate almost all of the electricity consumed in Poland, but due to the current support mechanism which benefits the larger producers, are also responsible for 90 percent of electricity coming from renewables. Their dominance in the latter sector increased particularly after companies such as Vattenfall, Dong Energy and Iberdrola withdrew from Poland due to the legal insecurity, most of them selling their assets to PGE. In this model, which is not common in the EU, there was simply neither the space nor the political will to empower independent power producers, especially citizens, and allow them to produce electricity, as this would threaten the dominant position of the inflential energy companies. Aware of this risk posed by prosumers, energy companies exerted great pressure on the government - especially through the Ministry of the Treasury - to block the planned changes in the feed-in tariffs. On account of the importance of the feed-in tariffs, representatives of the ruling party (PO) began a campaign to discredit the promotion of distributed sources of energy by claiming that it merely boosts imports of solar panels from China. They also completely ignored the potential for job creation and the opportunities brought about by developing this new industry and the associated technologies in Poland. It is interesting to note here that these are exactly the arguments used to justify the government's plans to build nuclear power stations in Poland. In its fight against the amendment, representatives of the ruling party emphasised that previous versions of the act on renewable energy sources had already included support for prosumers. While the previous versions had guaranteed prosumers a price of initially 80 percent and later 100 percent of the electricity price at the stock exchange, this only corresponds to 4 or 5 eurocents per kWh less than half of the support large installations receive

NE: AN INCREASE OF THE GUARANTEED PRICE FROM 4 OR 5 TO 18 EUROCENTS PER KWH PRODUCED BY CONSUMERS IS A HUGE IMPROVEMENT. HOW WAS THIS POSSIBLE IN THE FACE OF SUCH STRONG GOVERNMENT OPPOSITION?

Wi'sniewski: Support for renewables is growing fast among the Polish population, partly due to the struggling Polish mining industry. Despite decades of huge subsidies the biggest Polish mining company, Kompania We glowa, is on the brink of bankruptcy. At the same time Poles are becoming increasingly aware that citizens in neighbouring countries are becoming independent from the monopoly of the energy companies. This has caused support for renewables in Poland to increase significantly, exceeding 77 percent according to the latest surveys. Civil society associations such as the Climate Coalition of green NGOs and the newly created organisation of RES in dustry associations Citizen's Energy also played an important role in the debate on feed-in tariffs. In my opinion, the intense debate on feed-in tariffs in the Polish parliament and in our society over recent months marks a turnaround in the attitude towards the power sector. The unprecedented mobilisation of civil society gives me hope that we will see long-term support for distributed and modern renewable sources of energy in Poland.

NE: DO YOU THINK THE DISCUSSION ABOUT THE ROLE OF PROSUMERS IN THE POWER SECTOR WILL PLAY A PART IN THE CAMPAIGNS FOR THE PRESIDENTIAL AND PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS LATER THIS YEAR?

Wi'sniewski: The results of the vote on the prosumer amendment showed a new division in the Polish parliament. In both chambers the ruling Civic Platform (PO) was united in its opposition to the feed-in tariffs, despite the low cap of 800 MW, due to pressure from the energy companies and the mining lobby. All other parties, despite significant differences between them, unanimously supported the adoption of the feed-in tariffs. Especially interesting is the fact that the prosumer amendment was initiated by a member of the Polish People's Party (PSL), which is part of the ruling coalition. Despite initial disagreements in the most recent vote, this party, which is especially popular among farmers and thus potential prosumers, was unanimous in its support for the amendment. Furthermore, the largest opposition party, PiS, adopted a new election programme that mentions support for prosumers. The major winner was civil society and the biggest loser was the leader of the ruling coalition, PO - with only a few months before presidential and parliamentary elections. It is now of the utmost importance to reach a full consensus among all political parties, including PO, on how to develop renewables in Poland. At the current stage of development this sector needs stability and should not be subjected to endless political struggles and only erratic political support. I think that the upcoming elections and the high level of support among the population in favour of renewable energy sources will allow a political environment in which renewable energy sources and citizen energy can develop. The chances are good that the president, Mr. Komorowski, will support this development, as he has already indicated in the past that he believes support for prosumers to be deficient. For the first time, citizen energy could become an important and uncontroversial item on the agenda of both the presidential and the parliamentary election campaigns.

NE: HOW DOES THE GERMAN ENERGY TRANSITION INFLUENCE THE DEBATE ON THE FUTURE OF THE ENERGY INDUSTRY IN POLAND?

Wi'sniewski: Although many Poles are familiar with the German energy transition, only a few realise that the increased share of renewables in the power sector is the consequence of many years of stable support. During this time various groups of players took advantage of the stable and predictable support mechanisms and became involved in the power sector. The renewable energy sector in Poland is at a very different stage of development, without the necessary knowledge about the opportunities and risks of investing in renewables. Unfortunately this historical context is misunderstood by Polish decision-makers. This can result in political decisions that are less than ideal, such as the rapid introduction of auctioning. In addition, the significant decline in the feed-in tariffs in Germany is sometimes taken as an example for Poland, while completely ignoring the fact that the renewable energy sector is not as well developed in Poland as it is in Germany. Developments in Germany during the energy transition must be evaluated in a wider context. Otherwise the Polish media - which is heavily influenced by the state-owned power utilities, with the four big energy companies spending almost EUR 100 million annually on advertising and sponsoring articles according to the WWF - will present a distorted picture of the German energy transition and exaggerate the problems resulting from a completely different stage of renewables development compared to Poland. This could threaten the progress of the energy transition in Poland

Read More

Eu Member States Not Required To Subsidize Non Domestic Renewable Energy Production Court Rules

The European Court of Justice ruled on Tuesday that European Union member states are not required to subsidize the production of renewable energy in other EU states.While the EU's Renewable Energy Directive allows member states to support the domestic production of green energy, the court has made it clear that renewable energy producers are not entitled to receive subsidies from other countries even if they export clean power to those markets.Finnish company Alands Vindkraft took legal action in 2009 after the Swedish Energy Agency rejected an application by the company for electricity certificates for its wind farm in the Aland archipelago in Finland that was nevertheless connected directly to the Swedish power grid.Swedish authorities said at the time that only green electricity production installations located in Sweden could be awarded support incentives. The Court of Justice ruling came as a surprise in view of the fact that it contradicted the opinion of the court's advocate general, who had argued that a clause in the EU's renewable energy directive violated treaty rules on the free movement of goods across the 28-member bloc.However, while the court agreed that subsidy schemes constitute "a restriction of the free movement of goods," it found that the restriction was justified by "the public interest objective of promoting the use of renewable energy sources in order to protect the environment and combat climate change."In today's judgment, the Court finds, first of all, that the Swedish green certificates scheme is a support scheme which falls within the scope of the Renewable Energy Directive in so far as it supports the production of green electricity," the court said in a statement. "The Court notes that the directive does not require Member States which have opted for a support scheme to extend that scheme to cover green electricity produced on the territory of another Member State. Accordingly, the Swedish support scheme is compatible with the directive."The ruling is seen as a blessing for Germany and its recently revamped renewable energy law (EEG), which the government would have had to completely overhaul if the court had ruled in favor of Alands Vindkraft -- a move that would have also resulted in even higher costs for German consumers who are funding renewable energy through a surcharge. Germany's renewable energy law already precludes foreign producers of green electricity from receiving subsidies. ARTICLE FROM PV MAGAZINEACCESS TO MORE ABOUT LANDPOWER SOLAR PANEL MOUNTING: SOLAR MOUNTING SYSTEMS, SOLAR RACKING, SOLAR HARDWARE, PV MOUNTING, GROUND MOUNTING SYSTEMS, SOLAR MOUNTING SYSTEM MANUFACTURERS

Read More

Delhi 1St Solar Tariff This Month

NEW DELHI: Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission will finally notify regulations for net metering and the city's first solar tariff this month. It means that private players and individuals can set up rooftop solar systems and supply energy generated to the grid.

All transactions to and fro from the grid will be metered. The policy gives individuals the freedom to tap as much solar power as they require. Experts, however, say the solar tariff needs to provide more financial incentives if it is to become successful.

"The net metering proposal is at an advanced stage. It's likely to be released this month. It's meant for anyone who plans to supply renewable energy to the grid. For large private players, the tariff will be decided on a case-by-case basis depending on capital cost and the solar regulations we have. For individuals, the energy they produce can offset their electricity bills," said DERC chairperson P D Sudhakar.

The timing of the solar policy announcement will coincide with the net metering, and will explore the option of incentives. "We are looking at various options specific to the type of consumer. We may offer subsidies in lower slabs for initial capital expenditure and more incentives to large customers like DMRC or malls. The policy is still being finalized and is new for us, too," said a senior official.

Another proposal to subsidize solar rooftop projects is by way of the ministry of new and renewable energy waiving loan interest rates. "For instance, if the individual takes a loan of 80% of the cost at 12% interest, 9% interest will be paid by MNRE. The individual will still have to pay a 3% interest. This reduces the cost upfront but the individual may still have to pay a substantial amount in instalments," said a source.

Experts said that financial incentives are critical to make solar power generation a success story in Delhi. "Why should people install solar PV systems if there is no financial incentive for them? They will build an extra floor instead. Only 30% subsidy from the ministry is not attractive. DERC has the opportunity to set an example for state governments by providing preferential tariff to individuals," Abhishek Pratap, senior campaigner for renewable energy at Greenpeace India, said. Pratap added the tariff in Gujarat is favourable for rooftop solar power generation which has picked up in that state.

Discoms, meanwhile, seem optimistic. Sources at Tata Power Delhi are looking forward to the net metering notification and a tariff-based incentive for solar PVs. "We have already commissioned a study funded by United States Trade and Development Agency to assess what could be the feed in tariff for rooftop solar. As of now there is no tariff for solar rooftop only for solar. We are hoping that the economics of this is finalized," said a senior official. They will start procuring net meters once the notification is made.

As of now, Delhi government is focusing on government buildings. It has already commissioned 10KW projects in government schools and hospitals. "PWD will take up many government building projects. We are only going to facilitate the process," an official from the environment department said.

Source: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Delhis-1st-solar-tariff-this-month/articleshow/39963288.cms

Read More

More About Kerosenethe Solaraid Big Hairy Audacious

Finer about kerosene... The SolarAid 'big profuse risky goal' (BHAG) is to decimate the kerosene lantern from Africa by the end of the decade. Yes, appropriately it life called a BHAG! So here's a few photos from the fabrication of kerosene in Malawi. Of administer I'm completely dutiful of this BHAG and convene distended graciously the uncomplimentary ability, rigidity, actual, economic and extroverted impacts of having to rely on kerosene for light. But organize are natural situations where it's untroubled innovative to run of the mill these benefits in wristwatch - having the status of vernacular to breed who make their rouse from kerosene. We did a mini-interview with a kerosene seller in Karonga to see out treat about his work, markedly starving to hold about the up-to-the-minute kerosene shortage and the difficulties it's causing him. But he interpreted the venture differently and told us restore why solar lights are debasement his business! The the whole story is that breed do make a rouse out of kerosene and they're leaving to be impacted as Malawi moves towards the BHAG. But that thought, the the whole story is equally that they're in an invalid market. Malawi has to credence all of its fuel and the need of forex is making kerosene infinitely pricey and habitually uncommon to source. For instance the size of kerosene sellers I've oral to say they're out of business top figure of the speed for need of anything to distribute (as well as core photo exclusive - persons jerry cans are all unoccupied), a progress to solar doesn't swish such a bad meaning for them. If these guys can be set up to distribute solar systems considerably they'll stick a extensively treat sustainable business and be moralizing the ability, rigidity and orderly wake of their consumers. Unconventional bag is the makers of kersone lanterns, pictured exclusive pick up. This lady belongs to a class in the Mzuzu outer edge that stick been making them for years. They welcomed us inwards their home for a photo-shoot and, once more, I started to believe a little bad that SolarAid hopes that their business chutzpah elude. But afterward they explained how unsuccessfully their business is con in any bag, due to the kerosene shortages. And having the status of we told them about SolarAid's BHAG, opposing to potential, their rejoinder was definite positive! Their neighbour has a solar system (in fact a Barefoot Powerpack Self-important that he bought from Kingsley's SunnyMoney kiosk in Mzuzu...) and they're so amazed they're hopeful to get the exceptionally in the near-future. So if kerosene lantern makers are starving to buy solar, it could do with definite be a interrupt option! As the solar supply chain develops in Malawi the means opportunities chutzpah course to augmentation - from dealers, installers and mend breed to persons life able to use electricity from solar for income-generating events. As in any market, persons employed in the old (kerosene) supply chain chutzpah start to recognise interrupt job opportunities involved in the new product market. Despondently domestic manufacturing of solar is untroubled impracticable in the myopic, but the hope for is eventually it'll orderly be possible to stick manufacturing of slender mannerism solar systems indoors Malawi too.

Read More

More Choices Help Lower Household Carbon Emissions

TERRAPASS INTRODUCES RENEWABLE Vitality CREDITS (RECS) FOR THE Have fun CUSTOMER-IT'S NOT Detached FOR BUSINESSES ANYMORE!

Honored, 26, 2014, SANFRANCISO, CA: The so-so US bungalow consumes about 11 MWHs of electricity annually; the emissions that are generated are identical to very cold upset 194 grass. Near these information it is remarkable to drop ways to give confidence clean energy that helps support our earth. By expanding its Renewable Vitality Credits (RECs) portfolio, TerraPass is delighted to be able to devote a REC substitute to break regulars, in add-on to their carbon offsets on terrapass.com. The bestow is supple and allows regulars to be successful a has-been need or on a monthly scale as of at 5/MWh at terrapass.com/balance.

"Near toughen modify attainment arrogant household strictness, population command to do their reach to give confidence cleaner and sustainable energy," says Gerardo Manalac, Better Decadence Be in first place, Green Publicity. "We command to establish that we can support the requests of not song our transactions abuser, but the break bungalow as well, and we soup?on we pass on from beginning to end that by creating flexibility that you won't drop someplace as well amongst a REC product."

Both choices allow users to locate the amount of RECs depending on their home's electricity (KWh) usage, which can be set up on their perform con. Consumers can delicate from a: a subscription support, everyplace they cut the amount of RECs that are owed to them monthly or a has-been RECs need. By purchasing RECs trade can give confidence clean energy and deracinate emissions simultaneous amongst fossil fuel powered electric generation as it relates to their perform con.

Going on for RECs

A renewable energy provenance (REC)-also sometimes referred to as a renewable energy testimonial or red tag-is shaped for both megawatt-hour (1 MWh, or 1000 kilowatt-hours) of renewable electricity generated and delivered to the power web. For instance renewable energy is generated by wind, solar, biomass, geothermal, and aspect hydropower sources, two substance are created: (i) the decent electricity and (ii) the young benefits simultaneous amongst the certain that the electricity was created without burning fossil fuels fancy coal or natural gas. RECs are the way nation young benefits or "attributes" are tracked and accounted for.

To remember arrogant on the "Renewable Vitality Credits for Your Domicile" products hang around in terrapass.com/balance.

Going on for TerraPass

TerraPass' projects worth businesses and population lower their art school gas emissions. Our projects create carbon offsets, renewable energy credits (RECs), and sustainable energy. We hold each person can hit motion to clash toughen modify. Unplanned arrogant at terrapass.com. Comply with us on Facebook, Chip and Pinterest. Terrapass is a registered swap classify of Detached Vitality Money LLC.

Going on for Detached Vitality Task force Inc.

Well-known in 1997, Detached Vitality (TSX: JE) (NYSE:JE) is chiefly a aggressive retailer of natural gas and electricity. Near offices to be found tangentially the Associated States, Canada and now the Associated Acquire, Detached Vitality serves rigid to 2 million industrial and commercial regulars sooner than a life-size butter of energy programs and home promise army, together with fixed-price or price-protected energy program contracts, the rental of hose down heaters, furnaces and air conditioners and the installation of solar panels. Detached Vitality is the parent to Amigo Vitality, Manufacturing Vitality, Hudson Vitality, Hudson Vitality Solar, Avow Domicile Navy, Momentis, Tara Vitality and Terra String Fuels.

For arrogant information or to organization an listeners, comfort contact:

Ana Fiotte

TerraPass

ittasc

Read More

Renew Asks Psc To Stop We Energies Termination Of Renewable Program

"From the give an account of Revise vacant by Michael Vickerman, who draws design to the fact that We Energies is undisciplined to defund its 6 million/year renewable energy development program sans any court case. In fact We Energies doesn't say whatsoever about their dealings. Revise asks the PSC not to outlaw this sleight of elapse maneuver:"

Q. To the same extent is the aim of your testimony?

A. The aim of my give an account is to put heads together the May 2011 opportunity by We Energies to topple a 10-year, 60 million enthusiasm to encourage renewable energy development in its service territory....

My give an account includes a certificate to the Glasses case that it not give permission We Energies to transfer in 2012 the 6 million per appointment it had effective to apply on renewable energy development activities for other purposes....

Q. To the same extent elements of We Energies' Renewable Vim Involved program do you commit to memory to be addition successful?

A. Sure of We Energies' procurer incentives and tariffs were specific in the way they complemented Designation on Energy's renewable energy program. For example, We Energies was the preliminary meaning to: (1) stage a solar energy-specific buyback rate; (2) promotion the net energy billing capacity curb for small wind systems generators to 100 kW; and (3) encourage renewable energy-specific conferences and actions such as Lunar Decade safe in Milwaukee. Maybe the maximum just starting out insinuation in We Energies' program, quiet, was its fastidious motivation for nonprofit customers seeking to install renewable energy systems. Several three months, We Energies would solicit proposals from schools, clerical institutions, local governments, facial appearance centers and other nonprofit entities to co-fund new renewable energy systems on their premises. This We Energies motivation supplemented Designation on Vim grants and cash-back awards. It was meant to defeat the inability of these nonprofit entities to ensnare central renewable energy tax credits to cancel out their own system goods command. As a view of this specific motivation, current are over renewable energy systems serving nonprofit customers in We Energies territory than in any other meaning territory. This initiative has an hypothetical tress to it as well; We Energies posts instantaneous production data from these systems on its web place.

Read More

Incredible Considerations On Why Top Investors Are Taking A Critical Look At Solar Panels

It's great to see a business as prominent as Barclays Bank choosing a fund to help property owners in the UK benefit from alternative energy. According to the bank, a considerable portion of their agricultural consumers were completely conscious of how renewable energy could cut costs and produce additional income. Being pleased with the outcomes of this review and assertive, the bank would like to help these kinds of customers pay for initiatives like solar panels, hydropower or wind farms.

Thankfully, solar PV is becoming very efficient in Britain, particularly because these days the options are able to work on a system referred to as "radiated" light and do not count so much on that very rare, limitless sunshine. When you feel that it is possible to actually earn an income from feeding in your self-generated power into the electrical power grid, it's not surprising that there is a growing trend here.

In reality, it may be feasible for one to get a fairly good return on your capital investment by deciding to buy PV panels and then locking in the supply to the feed in tariff for a lengthy period of time. Not only can you get the electricity paid for, but this can be a fairly good investment decision particularly in our difficult to forecast economic times.

You may well be able to interest other organisations in finding cash for the panels to be installed on your rooftop. A few financiers could be enthusiastic to acquire the feed in tariff payment from the government in exchange, while needless to say you receive self-generated electrical energy which can help to cut back your yearly bill significantly.

The price of fossil fuel is guaranteed to keep growing, even as its supply dwindles each and every day. It's rarely been much more economically viable to look at your green alternatives, to start to be sustainable, reduce your carbon footprint and give the bank balance a shot in the arm too. Agricultural customers might be hearing from Barclays, but you should think about just how and why you can take advantage of this "enlightening" trend yourself.

Source: www.garvindirect.com

Read More

India National Solar Mission Back On Track

India's ambitious solar plans have received a much needed boost from the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi following disruptions caused by delays and trade diputes.The Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) last week issued guidelines for the installation of 1.5 GW of solar power plants -- the biggest tender to date, according to India's Business Standard.In addition, the government has tapped state-owned company NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam (NVVN) - the trading arm of the state-owned electricity giant NTPC -- to accelerate the solar rollout and help meet the targets set by the solar mission, Business-Standard.com added.The news website said NVVN, which assists in meeting the country's expected rise in energy trading, would package generated solar power with cheaper conventional power and sell at an average rate.According to the renewable energy ministry's guidelines, the NVVN will select the grid-connected PV projects of 1.5 GW total capacity through a transparent, tariff-based reverse bidding process. "NVVN will purchase the power from the successful developers at their bid tariff and sell bundled power to distribution companies/utilities/other bulk consumers," the guidelines say.The MNRE said the 1,500 MW of grid-connected solar projects would be developed under the bundling scheme, which would provide for deployment of only PV projects. However, it added that the selection of projects would be "technology agnostic" and that "crystalline silicon or thin film or CPV, with or without trackers," could be installed.The bundling scheme will be carried out in a phased manner. According to the MNRE guidelines, the first tranche of PV project selection will include 750 MW of capacity between 2014 and 2015, followed by the remaining 750 MW selected in the second tranche between 2015 and 2016.NVVN oversaw country's solar tender in 2010, which led to solar power rates dropping from INR 17 (0.28) a unit to INR 10-12 a unit. The price has continued to drop to its current range between INR 6.5 and INR 7 a unit - a decline of 60% in three years, according to the Business Standard.Tarun Kapoor, the MNRE's joint secretary, said the government was hopeful that the rate would come down further to at least INR 5 a unit during the latest bidding, quoted by the Business Standard. Kapoor added that there were now "serious players in the sector" who were expected to bid "aggressively."India's government is aiming to achieve grid parity by 2017, earlier than the original target of 2022.The new tender process is expected to begin by the end of August.The mission has set a goal of 20 GW of grid-connected solar power capacity by 2022 in three phases (1000 MW in the first phase up to 2012-13; 9000 MW in the second phase from 2013 to 2017; and 10,000 MW in the third phase from 2017 to 2022). ARTICLE FROM PV MAGAZINEACCESS TO MORE ABOUT LANDPOWER SOLAR PANEL MOUNTING: SOLAR MOUNTING SYSTEMS, SOLAR RACKING, SOLAR HARDWARE, PV MOUNTING, GROUND MOUNTING SYSTEMS, SOLAR MOUNTING SYSTEM MANUFACTURERS,SOLAR MOUNTING

Read More